Kodak Dx4530 Max Sd Card

about compact

Dear students,

moves the payday of tuition fees closer. In mid-December have already sent the payment issued by the university. For many, still the question of how the money should be applied over the whole study and with how much debt you finished studying. The last possible appeal or against the (permanent) payment notice, which applies to an entire program to proceed, is a case before the administrative court in Stuttgart. After receipt of the answer we are left only the possibility of students within four weeks after receipt of the answer file a complaint. This date will be achieved in many early as mid-January (11.1.2007). It is important to get back at a successful claim only those tuition fees, which have also complained. Currently there are two points of a chance of success:

1) The interest on the loan by the interest on the loan
(whose purpose, according to § 7 paragraph 1 sentence 1 LHGebG the financing of the program is), the students from financially weak households against those who have financially powerful parents, disadvantaged. The question is whether this discrimination is justified. In a differentiation criterion that the person on which it is written do not change, can, qualified required in order to justification. These are not given here. Insbesondere ist die Regelung unverhältnismäßig, da die Verzinsung des Darlehens weder ein geeignetes Mittel zur Erreichung des angestrebten Zwecks (Finanzierung des Studiums) noch das mildeste Mittel dafür ist. Somit liegt ein Verstoß gegen Art. 3 Abs. 1 GG dar.

2) Verstoß gegen den UN-Sozialpakt
Art. 13 Abs. 2 lit. c des Internationalen Pakts über Wirtschaftliche, Soziale und Kulturelle Rechte(UN-Sozialpakt), der durch Bundesgesetz (!!!!) innerstaatliches Recht wurde, besagt, dass „…der Hochschulunterricht auf jede geeignete Weise, insbesondere durch allmähliche Einführung der Unentgeltlichkeit, jedermann gleichermaßen entsprechend seinen Fähigkeiten zugänglich must be made. "The legal consequences of this binding system for the imported state laws are still unclear. Had the federal government in general the power to conclude such a contract? Is the scheme compulsory? Does this prohibition absolute? If not, the conditions under which fees may still be collected?

We require a strong support to the majority rejection by the students in the state of Baden-Württemberg to express. The effort on your part is simply the applied model application (download: http://www.gilitschenski.org/hohenheim/klageformular-hohenheim.pdf) completed and to send to the Administrative Court. A process will not occur because the Administrative Court and all other instances of test cases are performed, which are representative of all complaints. Note, however, that is required after the filing of the complaint from the Administrative Court for legal aid in the amount of 105 €. This amount is but about 2 / 3, regardless of whether the process won or lost, shall be repaid at the end. Thus, the effort is only 35 €. If the fees are declared unconstitutional, you will receive back the full 105 €.

In the first week we will give you more material (http://www.gilitschenski.org/hohenheim/flyer-klage.pdf) verteilen und euch die Klage vor dem Verwaltungsgericht informieren. Zudem bieten wir euch eine Informationsveranstaltung an:

Termin: 9.1.2007
Uhrzeit: 13:00 Uhr s.t
Ort: Katherinensaal/Euroforum

Es wäre toll, wenn ihr zahlreich erscheint.

Viele Grüße



Euer AStA