sound administrative court in Stuttgart over 300 complaints from students from Hohenheim have arrived. A total of 1,700 complaints were filed.
Thursday, January 25, 2007
Microwave Sparking With Wax
actions
sound administrative court in Stuttgart over 300 complaints from students from Hohenheim have arrived. A total of 1,700 complaints were filed.
sound administrative court in Stuttgart over 300 complaints from students from Hohenheim have arrived. A total of 1,700 complaints were filed.
Tuesday, January 23, 2007
How Long Does It Take For Sperm Stains Yo Go Away
demo on 26.01.2007 in Karlsruhe
meeting place for students from Hohenheim and Stuttgart:
12:30 clock, Central Station Stuttgart.
12:30 clock, Central Station Stuttgart.
Thursday, January 11, 2007
The Cover On My Microwave
deadline 16/01/2007
The application deadline is 16.1 (the beginning of the month Time: 3 days after the postmark). We have received today from a student their envelope with postage stamp. Unlike us, they have this thrown away yet. Date of dispatch of the fee decision: 13.12.2006. 
The application deadline is 16.1 (the beginning of the month Time: 3 days after the postmark). We have received today from a student their envelope with postage stamp. Unlike us, they have this thrown away yet. Date of dispatch of the fee decision: 13.12.2006.
Wednesday, January 10, 2007
Green Black Metal Core Scooter
246 students ......
and it never ends! 246 Hohenheim students have registered with us for the distributor.
to an information distribution: We have decided today in AStA a common distribution with the crying of the Uni-Stuttgart to create. Since the dates are the same for students of both universities plaintive, and the Stuttgart and even with their test case for us Hohenheim sue, this is the optimal solution. 
and it never ends! 246 Hohenheim students have registered with us for the distributor.
to an information distribution: We have decided today in AStA a common distribution with the crying of the Uni-Stuttgart to create. Since the dates are the same for students of both universities plaintive, and the Stuttgart and even with their test case for us Hohenheim sue, this is the optimal solution.
Tuesday, January 9, 2007
Gaseous After Food Poisoning
183 students complain!
183 students have now registered with the event information in the application distribution. Furthermore you will receive this week the latest and most current information. 
183 students have now registered with the event information in the application distribution. Furthermore you will receive this week the latest and most current information.
How To Tell If Onyx Gem Is Real
copies of the application
According to § 82 Code of Administrative Procedure, but must be accompanied by copies of the application not the + fonts for the other parties. So if you do not want the courts deal with photocopying, then itself decide
----
http://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/vwgo/__81.html 
According to § 82 Code of Administrative Procedure, but must be accompanied by copies of the application not the + fonts for the other parties. So if you do not want the courts deal with photocopying, then itself decide
----
(1) 1 The application must be raised in writing with the court. 2 The administrative court may also on record by the clerk of the office will be charged.
(2) The complaint and all pleadings shall, subject to § 55a para 2 sentence 2 copies for the other participants are attached.
http://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/vwgo/__81.html
Monday, January 8, 2007
Cost Of Wart Removal For Dogs
suspension of action
the part of the university's actions left the rest! With reference to the test cases.
It is necessary for our students that is not a lawyer. It will be added only the court fees, but we get back, we win the complaints :-) 
the part of the university's actions left the rest! With reference to the test cases.
It is necessary for our students that is not a lawyer. It will be added only the court fees, but we get back, we win the complaints :-)
Wednesday, January 3, 2007
Kodak Dx4530 Max Sd Card
about compact
Dear students,
moves the payday of tuition fees closer. In mid-December have already sent the payment issued by the university. For many, still the question of how the money should be applied over the whole study and with how much debt you finished studying. The last possible appeal or against the (permanent) payment notice, which applies to an entire program to proceed, is a case before the administrative court in Stuttgart. After receipt of the answer we are left only the possibility of students within four weeks after receipt of the answer file a complaint. This date will be achieved in many early as mid-January (11.1.2007). It is important to get back at a successful claim only those tuition fees, which have also complained. Currently there are two points of a chance of success:
1) The interest on the loan by the interest on the loan
(whose purpose, according to § 7 paragraph 1 sentence 1 LHGebG the financing of the program is), the students from financially weak households against those who have financially powerful parents, disadvantaged. The question is whether this discrimination is justified. In a differentiation criterion that the person on which it is written do not change, can, qualified required in order to justification. These are not given here. Insbesondere ist die Regelung unverhältnismäßig, da die Verzinsung des Darlehens weder ein geeignetes Mittel zur Erreichung des angestrebten Zwecks (Finanzierung des Studiums) noch das mildeste Mittel dafür ist. Somit liegt ein Verstoß gegen Art. 3 Abs. 1 GG dar.
2) Verstoß gegen den UN-Sozialpakt
Art. 13 Abs. 2 lit. c des Internationalen Pakts über Wirtschaftliche, Soziale und Kulturelle Rechte(UN-Sozialpakt), der durch Bundesgesetz (!!!!) innerstaatliches Recht wurde, besagt, dass „…der Hochschulunterricht auf jede geeignete Weise, insbesondere durch allmähliche Einführung der Unentgeltlichkeit, jedermann gleichermaßen entsprechend seinen Fähigkeiten zugänglich must be made. "The legal consequences of this binding system for the imported state laws are still unclear. Had the federal government in general the power to conclude such a contract? Is the scheme compulsory? Does this prohibition absolute? If not, the conditions under which fees may still be collected?
We require a strong support to the majority rejection by the students in the state of Baden-Württemberg to express. The effort on your part is simply the applied model application (download: http://www.gilitschenski.org/hohenheim/klageformular-hohenheim.pdf) completed and to send to the Administrative Court. A process will not occur because the Administrative Court and all other instances of test cases are performed, which are representative of all complaints. Note, however, that is required after the filing of the complaint from the Administrative Court for legal aid in the amount of 105 €. This amount is but about 2 / 3, regardless of whether the process won or lost, shall be repaid at the end. Thus, the effort is only 35 €. If the fees are declared unconstitutional, you will receive back the full 105 €.
In the first week we will give you more material (http://www.gilitschenski.org/hohenheim/flyer-klage.pdf) verteilen und euch die Klage vor dem Verwaltungsgericht informieren. Zudem bieten wir euch eine Informationsveranstaltung an:
Termin: 9.1.2007
Uhrzeit: 13:00 Uhr s.t
Ort: Katherinensaal/Euroforum
Es wäre toll, wenn ihr zahlreich erscheint.
Viele Grüße
Euer AStA 
Dear students,
moves the payday of tuition fees closer. In mid-December have already sent the payment issued by the university. For many, still the question of how the money should be applied over the whole study and with how much debt you finished studying. The last possible appeal or against the (permanent) payment notice, which applies to an entire program to proceed, is a case before the administrative court in Stuttgart. After receipt of the answer we are left only the possibility of students within four weeks after receipt of the answer file a complaint. This date will be achieved in many early as mid-January (11.1.2007). It is important to get back at a successful claim only those tuition fees, which have also complained. Currently there are two points of a chance of success:
1) The interest on the loan by the interest on the loan
(whose purpose, according to § 7 paragraph 1 sentence 1 LHGebG the financing of the program is), the students from financially weak households against those who have financially powerful parents, disadvantaged. The question is whether this discrimination is justified. In a differentiation criterion that the person on which it is written do not change, can, qualified required in order to justification. These are not given here. Insbesondere ist die Regelung unverhältnismäßig, da die Verzinsung des Darlehens weder ein geeignetes Mittel zur Erreichung des angestrebten Zwecks (Finanzierung des Studiums) noch das mildeste Mittel dafür ist. Somit liegt ein Verstoß gegen Art. 3 Abs. 1 GG dar.
2) Verstoß gegen den UN-Sozialpakt
Art. 13 Abs. 2 lit. c des Internationalen Pakts über Wirtschaftliche, Soziale und Kulturelle Rechte(UN-Sozialpakt), der durch Bundesgesetz (!!!!) innerstaatliches Recht wurde, besagt, dass „…der Hochschulunterricht auf jede geeignete Weise, insbesondere durch allmähliche Einführung der Unentgeltlichkeit, jedermann gleichermaßen entsprechend seinen Fähigkeiten zugänglich must be made. "The legal consequences of this binding system for the imported state laws are still unclear. Had the federal government in general the power to conclude such a contract? Is the scheme compulsory? Does this prohibition absolute? If not, the conditions under which fees may still be collected?
We require a strong support to the majority rejection by the students in the state of Baden-Württemberg to express. The effort on your part is simply the applied model application (download: http://www.gilitschenski.org/hohenheim/klageformular-hohenheim.pdf) completed and to send to the Administrative Court. A process will not occur because the Administrative Court and all other instances of test cases are performed, which are representative of all complaints. Note, however, that is required after the filing of the complaint from the Administrative Court for legal aid in the amount of 105 €. This amount is but about 2 / 3, regardless of whether the process won or lost, shall be repaid at the end. Thus, the effort is only 35 €. If the fees are declared unconstitutional, you will receive back the full 105 €.
In the first week we will give you more material (http://www.gilitschenski.org/hohenheim/flyer-klage.pdf) verteilen und euch die Klage vor dem Verwaltungsgericht informieren. Zudem bieten wir euch eine Informationsveranstaltung an:
Termin: 9.1.2007
Uhrzeit: 13:00 Uhr s.t
Ort: Katherinensaal/Euroforum
Es wäre toll, wenn ihr zahlreich erscheint.
Viele Grüße
Euer AStA
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)